Switch recorded views. No live replay.
The earlier transaction
An approval-shaped input
AMOUNT IN THE INPUT
The next transaction
Original history:
Opening the recorded inspection…
Read the case note ↗The inspection export is missing, altered or inconsistent. No result can be displayed.
Try reloading this page. No result is displayed unless the recording passes its integrity checks.
ONE CHANGE IN REAL BLOCKCHAIN HISTORY
One earlier amount set to zero. The next transaction went from success to revert in the recorded replay.
Explore a recorded replay. The real chain stays untouched.
What could this be useful for?Switch recorded views. No live replay.
The earlier transaction
An approval-shaped input
AMOUNT IN THE INPUT
The next transaction
Original history:
HOW FAR DID THE CHANGE REACH?
Opening this demo performs no fresh replay or independent verification. The real chain was not changed.
A transaction can succeed in real history — and revert when one earlier input changes.
RHOOK asks that “what if?” question in an alternative replay. Here, the next transaction changed while 278 other downstream results stayed the same.
A wallet, app or automated agent could use verified alternatives to investigate what an action depends on. This demo shows that underlying capability on one fixed historical case.
The exact internal revert cause is not established. This case does not prove a token balance or protect a live wallet.
Of 279 later events, one changed from success to revert. Only that transaction has a separately recorded verified Claim.
Each square is one arrival. This map is local lifecycle inspection, not 279 independently verified Claims.
| Transaction | Actual | Branch |
|---|
No arrivals match this search. Try a transaction locator or clear the filter.
Two different native implementations agreed on the alternative. One Claim was verified under a pinned profile. This page displays that record.
Read the case note ↗Explore the source ↗
BRANCH PROTOCOL 0.2
Acceptance establishes this negative answer under the profile. It does not mean the branch transaction succeeded or authorize an application action.
The export is not a standalone verification package. Original Packet and admitted world context are not included.
All nine coverage obligations were discharged in the recorded verification. Expand an obligation to see its exact check identifiers.
HOW THIS ANSWER WAS ESTABLISHED
Independent context import is unsupported by this preview. A complete independent verification would require the original Packet, admitted acquired-world context and authenticated verifier deployment.
EXPLICIT CONSUMER POLICY · ILLUSTRATION
Require the selected subject and world, pinned Query/Claim/profile, four bindings, all nine obligations and accepted trust assumptions. Then inspect the established lifecycle comparison.
This illustration uses the recorded comparison for 70397233:5. Switching world views or exploring other transactions does not change that comparison. No live receipt is created and no application action is authorized.
In a live integration, consume the direct answer from an admitted SDK handle in the same authenticated context. A copied JSON result cannot substitute for that authority.
Target ; selected subject .
Encoded amount: → 0. Both derived Message.Data values contain 68 bytes.
The transaction, spender and every non-Data field were retained.
RETAINED ACTUAL CONTROL
ORIGINAL A/B BRANCH EXECUTIONS, NOW RECORDED
A new, preselected Data-only request produced an alternate world and one verified lifecycle Claim in the bounded Chain 4663 domain.
“Approval” describes the input’s approve-shaped encoding. ERC-20 compliance, token balance or allowance proofs and the exact revert cause are not established.